First of all, I want to thank all of you for all of the amazing work you've
done: when I began this project at the beginning of the summer, I saved my
maternal grandfather's ancestry for last, because I assumed it would be the
most difficult. We don't know much about our patriarch, J. Refugio G.
Hermosillo, before he crossed the border in 1926; he was 43 at the time,
and had already lived a lifetime. We had no contact with his family, his
parents and siblings dying long before we were born. All we knew was that
he was from a small town in Zacatecas called Montesa, and that, according
to him, he descended from one of the founding families. So, I wasn't
expecting to find much. But was I wrong! I started with his birth
certificate and the 3 generations named on it, and found the LDS website;
by the end of the first weekend, I had traced him all the way back to his
g2 grandparents, and only stopped, because the curas didn't list
grandparents before the late 18th Century (as you all know). But anyway, I
want to thank all of you, because I know SOMEONE had to index those
archives relative to Nueva Galicia, and I have a feeling it was YOU. MIL
GRACIAS A TODOS USTEDES, los nuevosrancheros y los somosprimoseros, for the
trailblazing work you've done and are doing, in regards to researching and
sharing the genealogy and history of Nueva Galicia and colonial Mexico in
general! (and for helping me make my 82 year-old mother and her 8 surviving
siblings very happy, learning about their colorful ancestors!)
A little background on my line: my grandfather, Jose Refugio Gonzalez, was
born in Montesa, Zacatecas, 4 Jul 1883, to Antonio Gonzalez and Susana
Sanchez. He was born with the Gonzalez surname, but some time while still
in Mexico, we figure around 1905, he changed it to "Hermosillo"; we never
knew why he changed it (we've often joked that he obviously didn't want
someone to find him…), nor why he chose "Hermosillo," but that's the name
he gave to his wife, Ana Olivas, of Juarez, as well as to their 11
children, born in California, and it's the name proudly worn by 5
generations of their descendants. "J. Refugio G. Hermosillo" was how he
always signed his name, and is the name on his death certificate and
tombstone.
That said, I started this endeavor not expecting to research the surname
"Hermosillo," since we assumed it had no history in the family prior to
1905 (and not even knowing the history of the surname in los Altos) - that
is, until I found the 1798 marriage record for grandfather's great
grandparents, Rafael Gonzalez & Maria Dolores de Avila, which clearly lists
the groom as:
"RAFAEL GONZALES DE HERMOSILLO, hijo legitimo de VICENTE GONZALES DE
HERMOSILLO y de JUANA DOROTHEA DIAZ DE LEON."
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/V5FZ-TSC
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15272-51812-83?cc=1804458&wc…
I was floored! I was thrilled! Alli esta mi segundo apellido! Y sera
alguien de categoria! Who was this GONZALEZ DE HERMOSILLO?? What did he
do?? How are we connected to him? What didn't abuelo tell us??
And that's where my journey really began. I googled the name and was led to
Nuestros Ranchos, amongst other websites, and I began reading through the
message boards. I learned about the conquistador, and his descendants
settling in los Altos, and about Gonzalez Leal's tomes, and the 117 spanish
families identified as the first-comers (and many whose surnames appear in
my tree), and how they intermarried throughout the Spanish Mandate (as I
witnessed, in my tree). And as I continue my research and get to know my
ancestors, I begin to feel a part of that history, that I am a product of
these adventurers, these hacendados, asistentas, capitanes, peones,
esclavos, and maybe even a Tlataoni… I was hooked! I need more! This is
better than a dusty old history book or any old video game!
So here I am, hoping to learn more about who it took to make me who I am,
and how they lived their lives, and hoping to share my findings with others
with the same intention, as well as with the same love for history. Muchos
somos parientes: les mando un fuerte abrazo. Y perdoname por no escribir
en español, pero ya esta tarde y !hablo mucho!
My focus families are the following (I group them because these branches
tend to intermarry or are associated:
En Pinos & Ojuelos & Aguascalientes:
Gonzalez de Hermosillo,
Gil de Esparza
Diaz de Leon
De Avila
Carrillo Lisardi
Gonzalez Murguia
Duron
Alvarado
Martin de Sotomayor, Martin de Camacho, Lozano, de Ruedas y de Islas, and
associated lines
En Pinos & los Altos & Aguascalientes:
Gomez [de Sotomayor]
Tiscareño de Huerta (and the Tiscareño, Ruiz de Esparza and associated
lines)
Ruiz de Villaseñor
Sanchez de la Mejorada
Muñoz de ?
En Pinos & Aguascalientes:
Delgado (Diego & Isabel de Isla Martinez Lozano)
Delgado y Ocampo & Valensuela & Chevarria Merquelan
Gaitan & Arias de Bedolla (roots in SLP & GTO, including Cortes y Galvan)
Rodriguez de Herrera o de Jara
Other surnames I'm working on are Dominguez Samudio & Lopez del Castillo,
Candelas & Buenrostro, Bernal de la Serda, Lopez de los Reyes, Ortiz de
Anda.
And again, thank all of you, for laying down the groundwork, and making it
easier for us newbies, to find our way to our ancestors. .
Gracias y saludos,
Manuel Diez Hermosillo "Manny"
http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/jrefugioghermosillo
Introductions aside, I have my first request for assistance:
WHICH VICENTE GONZALES DE HERMOSILLO MARRIED JUANA DOROTHEA DIAZ DE LEON?
I have his name appearing in the documents of his children, grandchildren
and widow, but I have none of his vitals. And I've seen his name using
various combinations of "Jose Vicente Ferrer Gonzalez de Hermosillo"
(though not all at the same time). The problem is, there are numerous
"Vicente Gonzalez's" living during his possible time period and living in
the communities where he most likely lived (Pinos, Ojuelos y los Altos en
general, maybe Aguascalientes). I've been constructing the trees of each
and every one of them, to see which would correspond with mine, and I've
narrowed it down to three (for now). But I'm still stalled.
Here's what I have on my G4's Vicente Gonzalez and Juana Dorothea Diaz:
JOSE VICENTE FERRER GONZALEZ DE HERMOSILLO
b. 1734-1744. He married JUANA DOROTHEA DIAZ DE LEON, daughter of Andres
Diaz Duron and Maria Estephania Carrillo Diaz, some time between 1760-1764,
either in Pinos, Zacatecas, or in Ojuelos, Jalisco. She was born 4 June
1744 in Pinos, Zacatecas.
Their children were:
1. Ma. Josepha Ignasia Pheliciana Gonzalez de Hermosillo, b. 19 Nov
1764, Ojuelos, Jalisco.
2. Jose Vicente Gonzalez de Hermosillo, b. 11 Jun 1766, Pinos, Zacatecas
3. Julian Antonio Rafael Gonzalez Diaz, b. 16 Apr 1768, Ojuelos, Jalisco.
4. Maria Guadalupe de Santiago Gonzalez Diaz, b. 16 Jan 1771, Ojuelos,
Jalisco.
5. Antonio Rafael Gonzalez de Hermosillo, b. 3 Mar 1773, Ojuelos,
Jalisco.
6. Jose Romano Gonzalez Diaz, b. 12 Aug 1777, Montesa, Pinos, Zacatecas
7. Maria Josefa Ignasia Gonzalez Diaz, b. 29 Mar 1779, Montesa, Pinos,
Zacatecas.
They zigzag through those two communities, which is unusual in my lines.
The distance isn't great, but it wasn't like they could hop in the chevy
and drive to abuela's house, right? What did he do, that kept him (or her)
moving between ranchos?
Since their first child Maria Josefa Ignacia Phelicana was born on the
Buenavista in Ojuelos, in Nov 1764, I thought that might be a good starting
point for his birthplace and marriage. But again, it can be anywhere.
Juana Dorothea Diaz, widowed, would marry a second time to Francisco Xavier
Alonso, on 30 Nov 1781, in Montesa, Pinos, Zacatecas. So Vicente Gonzalez
died some time between 1779-1781, and probably in Montesa, Pinos. Juana
Dorothea was born in 1744, Vicente could've been born around the same time,
and just died tragically young. But, what if he was older, and had been
married before, and with children?
That is where I am. If anyone can lead me in the right direction, it would
be greatly appreciated, and I hope to pay it forward!
PS - On the partida for Rafael & Maria Dolores, note the padrinos: Jose
Trinidad Gil Esparza and Maria Ygnacia Gonzalez - Rafael's younger sister
and her fiance, who would marry two months later, their partida on the
opposite page: the couples took turns being each other's padrinos! Also,
Jose Trinidad was the brother of another g3 grandfather, Alexo Gil de
Esparza. I'm stuck on that line, as well: Gil's and Ruiz de Esparza's, from
Aguascalientes?
Carlos,
So everyone can follow what you are talking about. It is the CONFIRMACION DE OFICIO: FRANCISCO HERMOSILLO MEXICO,177,N.58 1607-5-30 in Audencia de México under Archivo General de Indias found at http://pares.mcu.es/
I do see where at the top of image 5 where it states he is "Francisco Hermosillo vecino de esta ciudad ...hijo legitimo de Juan González Hermosillo y Ana Rodríguez su legitimo mujer mis padres difuntos y nieto de Gonzalo García Hermosillo y Leonor Sánchez Parra su mujer mis abuelos paternos; de Gonzalo Magdaleno y María Hernández su mujer mis abuelos maternos"
Then on the 8th line from the bottom it talks about his brother Juan and it says "Juan González Hermosillo vecino de esta ciudad de México hijo legitimo de Juan González Hermosillo y Ana Rodríguez su mujer vecinos de esta ciudad de México...padre natural de la villa de Guadalcanal en el reino de Castilla y la dicha mi madre de esta dicha ciudad"
On image 6 I see where you it mentions what looks like the
- Log in to post comments
GREAT FIND CARLOS!!
I'd like to add, as far as I know, the "Guadalcanal" pedigree is based on one document, which would be the aforementioned Ordenes of a great-grandson of Juan GdeH and Maria Munoz: limpiezas de sangre are NOT infallible. I recently debunked a 1651 prueba de nobleza for Geronimo Magdaleno Salceda, when this one joined the Orden de Santiago; his limpieza gives a pedigree for the Magdaleno's of Valladolid/Morelia, that totally contradicts every other document I've found at PARES and FamilySearch. After further research, I discovered that there was an industry for forged pedigrees, due to the fact that many had conversos in their immediate lines. The downside to this is, since 1651, many historians and genealogists have since used that document to establish the pedigree of the Magdaleno's of Valladolid.
That said: we need to find more documentation to support the Guadalcanal pedigree! GREAT WORK, CARLOS!
Manny Diez Hermosillo
- Log in to post comments
Thanks for checking on the Ramirez, Armando, and thanks again for the clarification. Must remove all doubts!
Manny Diez Hermosillo
- Log in to post comments
I want to share what I was able to "read" from the mentioned "Confirmación de Oficio"
It starts on apr-20th-1606 and is made by request of Francisco González de Hermosillo who declares that he´s been "escriviente" for over 10 years. The first lines were the most difficult for me to read and I read only small pieces like :
"...... de diez años a esta parte....ha servido el oficio de escribiente..." ....."y que al presente soy de edad de veintiocho años y tengo de hacienda más de 1,500 pesos de oro común...."
Then Francisco refers to another informacion made by his brother Juan González de Hermosillo 9 years earlier:
"En la Cd. de México en la Nva España 16 días de Enero de 1597.......Pérez de Vivero corregidor de esta Cd. por su magestad y en presencia de mí Juan Pérez de Rivera, notario público de número de la dicha Cd. por su magestad. Juan González de Hermosillo El Mozo, expresó el pedimento de la información original de que se hace mención. Juan González de Hermosillo vecino de
- Log in to post comments
In image 7/46 I read the following:
"En la villa de Guadalcanal a diez día del mes de febrero de 1584 ante el regidor Gonzalo Xuárez de Ortega alcalde ordinario se presentó Francisco Ramírez vecino de esta villa en nombre de Juan G de H por el poder que sigue:
Sepan cuantos esta carta .....yo Juan G de H natural de la villa de Guadalcanal en los reinos de Castilla y vecino de esta cd de MMexico otorgo todo mi poder ......a Fco de Silva(¿?)(Oliva¿?) y a Fco Ramírez mi primo vecinos de la dicha villa.......escrito en la Cd de Mexico a 20 días del mes de Octubre de 1583 años..."
"........Felipe .....notario público de número de esta cd por su magestad dieron fe conocer al otorgante........Diego Rodríguez de León, notario público......los escribanos que aquí firmamos testificamos y damos fe"
"Francisco Ramírez vecino de esta villa de Guadalcanal en nombre de Juan H de H vecino de la cd de Mexico por virtude del poder que tengo del que hago presentación digo....me conviene averiguar y
- Log in to post comments
What I understand of the mentioned document is that it is an "Información" that refers to other two previous "informaciones", and "gestiones"
Francisco González in 1606 declares to be 28 years of age and refers to another información made by his brother Juan in 1597.
In the información of 1597 is inmediately referred the previous información of 1584 that the father of Francisco and Juan El Mozo, called there Juan G de H El Viejo.
This Juan El Viejo gave Poder in 1583 to his cousin Francisco Ramírez and his brother in law
Francisco de Silva ? vecinos de Guadalcanal to request the "Información de Limpieza..."
We see that a good number of witnesses is required in that informacion made in Guadalcanal in 1584.
Later in the document we see the witnesses presented in 1597 in Mexico City that were "naturales" of Guadalcanal and that for that reason are able to testify about this family.
One of the important points of the document (I think) is the fact that the three sisters of Juan G de
- Log in to post comments
Carlos,
Your theory still doesn't fit and the theory that Sergio Gutiérrez first proposed is the one that does fit. Since Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra was in Mexico City with a wife and children from 1558 through 1597 then he was not in Guadalcanal in 1581 through 1582 with wife and children when the brother of our Juan González de Hermosillo sent for him on 12 October 1581.
The first child of Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra and Ana Rodríguez de Madaleno was Leonor and she was baptized 15 June 1559 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-9758-14029-44
These are two different families. They are probably related due to the fact that they both use the García Hermosillo and González de Hermosillo surnames and they are all originally from Guadalcanal. But Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra and the Juan González de Hermosillo married to María Muñoz are two different people.
Saludos,
Armando
- Log in to post comments
By Sergio Gutierrez
I ordered them on Monday and they arrived today.
Vol I Padron 1649, p29
Casa y Estancia de Diego Alonso del Pedroso, está de la cabecera 5 leguas: Diego Alonso del Pedroso español, Paula de Torres española su muger, Alonso Ramirez su hijo solt. 20, Paula, 5.
Padron 1650, p74
Casa y Estancia de Diego Alonso, que está de la cabecera 6 leguas: Diego Alonso español, Paula de Torres española su muger, Alonso Ramirez su hijo solt. 22, Paula, 7.
There are other children listed, as well, and slaves & indian criados.
Paula de Torres la madre is looking good as madrina for the 1645 wedding, and Alonso Ramirez would've been 16-17.
There are 2 Alonso Ramirez listed in the 1679 Jalostotitlan Padron, from "Historia de nuestra señora de San Juan de los Lagos," by Alberto Santoscoy, p44:
c. est.a Polonia de Torres Alonso Ramirez ++ Francisca de Torres Juan Perez
But he is likely the one on p 351 (right after the entry for Nicolas Ramirez de Hermosillo):
est.a Alonso
- Log in to post comments
Hola familia,
Regarding "Alonso" being part of the surname, as opposed to the given name:
I went back and looked at my notes, to see what led me to this conclusion, and there's enough material to make a convincing case, specifically, the 29 Dec 1666 confirmations for Melchor Gonzalez de Hermosillo and his brother, Sebastian, sons of Diego Alonso & Luisa de Nava, on which they are listed as "Melchor Alonso" and "Sebastian Alonso" (right image, their sister Maria Gonzalez is also listed):
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19046-22796-47?cc=1874591&wc…
That was in Teocaltiche, by the way. This shows us that children other than the Diego's used "Alonso." Also, the Spanish children on this page are listed with their surnames, therefore establishing "Alonso" as a possible surname for this branch (if you look in the left image, you'll see Andres Alonso, son of another Diego Alonso and Francisca Sanchez. He's probably an Hinojos, anyone?).
- Log in to post comments
Btw, looking at the 29 Dec 1666 Confirmaciones en Teocaltiche: I misread the Andres Alonso entry: Francisco Sanchez is the padrino, the mother isn't listed. This is likely Andres Munoz de Hermosillo.
Left image, midpage:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19046-22796-47?cc=1874591&wc…
Manny Diez Hermosillo
- Log in to post comments
Hello Nuestros Ranchos Forum,
My ancestor Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo is married to Maria Munoz and lookin through old posts i saw this and needed help explaining it. It says theres a Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo who is the father of Maria Munoz's husband Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo and also on here theres a Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo who has a wife name Leonor Parra Sanches. Are the Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo's the same people? possible the same people? Dad and son? or not the same people at all? I tried lookin on the internet but that just made it worse. theres to many trees that don't match each other and that don't match here on the forum. Also is the oldest Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo that's married to Catalia Ramirez not part of the tree anymore or is he probably the father of one of these Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo;s. Thanks Everybody
Danny C. Alonso
- Log in to post comments
Hi Daniel,
At this time, things are inconclusive.
I think Armando’s post from 2 feb 2015 says it best:
“…Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra was in Mexico City with a wife and children from 1558 through 1597 then he was not in Guadalcanal in 1581 through 1582 with wife and children when the brother of our Juan González de Hermosillo sent for him on 12 October 1581.
The first child of Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra and Ana Rodríguez de Madaleno was Leonor and she was baptized 15 June 1559 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-9758-14029-44
These are two different families. They are probably related due to the fact that they both use the García Hermosillo and González de Hermosillo surnames and they are all originally from Guadalcanal. But Juan González de Hermosillo y Sánchez Parra and the Juan González de Hermosillo married to María Muñoz are two different people.”
Manny Diez Hermosillo
- Log in to post comments
Thank you Manny. This is kinda confusing but If the 2 Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo's are not the same and the 2 Gonzalo de Hermosillo's are not the same, but we know our Juan Gonzales de Hermosillo's father is name Gonzalo de Hermosillo and the father of the other Juan Gonzales de Hermosilo who is married to Ana Rodrigues Magdaleno is named Gonzalo de Hermosillo, could the older Gonzalo de Hermosillo be the father of our Gonzalo who is the father of our Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo. Also is the Magdaleno married to the other Juan related to our Magdaleno's?
Danny C. Alonso
- Log in to post comments
Manny,
this is probly the brother of our Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo :
http://www.archivesportaleurope.net/ead-display/-/ead/pl/aicode/ES-4109…
Danny C. Alonso
- Log in to post comments
Manny,
this is probly the brother of our Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo :
http://www.archivesportaleurope.net/ead-display/-/ead/pl/aicode/ES-4109…
Danny C. Alonso
- Log in to post comments
Danny,
We need to be careful with speculating on the family of either Gonzalo García de Hermosillo.
First of all, we don't have any documentation that our Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo was ever in Mexico. Since we descend from the Juan González de Hermosillo that went to Mexico in 1582 all we have is the letter by his brother Gonzalo García de Hermosillo asking for Juan González de Hermosillo, his wife, and children to be given a license to go to Mexico from Guadalcanal, Spain and the subsequent license. It states that the father of Juan González de Hermosillo is Gonzalo García Hermosillo. Lookup Juan González de Hermosilla and INDIFERENTE,2060,N.138 in the Búsqueda Avanzada at http://pares.mcu.es. The father is named on page 5. We don't have the mother or grandparents of our Juan González de Hermosillo.
Since Sergio Gutierrez shared the testimony of Domingo de Lomelín that states that " Juan gonzales de hermosillo y de ana [maria] munos su mujer naturales de guadalcanal" http://www
- Log in to post comments
Thank you Armando. I guess i got over excited trying to find out who Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillos parents are and I guess I thouht people with the same names have to be related but i guess its harder than that. I'll look at other places on my tree for now.
Danny C. Alonso
- Log in to post comments
Danny,
Here's some more info even though you are already looking at your other lines.
He might be the Juan de Hermosilla son of "Hernán Pacheco y de Inés de Hermosilla, vecinos de la villa de Escalona" that went to Peru in 1537. CONTRATACION,5536,L.5,F.18V(2) so he doesn't even look to be from Guadalcanal.
There was also a Juan de Hermosillo from Burgos, son of Alonso de Hermosillo y de Catalina González, that went to Mexico in 1515. The license for passage is at http://pares.mcu.es CONTRATACION,5536,L.1,F.406(1)
For a long time many thought that Juan de Hermosillo was the ancestor of the Juan González de Hermosillo that married Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno but the CONFIRMACION DE OFICIO: FRANCISCO HERMOSILLO from 1607 MEXICO,177,N.58 shows that they aren't related, at least not in the way they once thought they were. I would still like to get a hold of Jaime Holcombe's sheets on that family to see what he had.
Coincidentally, Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno was the daughter of Gonzalo
- Log in to post comments
Thank you Armando, this is great information. I saw on one of the old posts someone say that Alonso de Hermosillo and Catalina Gonzalez was where they got the Gonzalez de Hermosillo but I guess thats not true. There seems like a lot of made up trees on geni about the Hermosillo's. Thank you for the villalobos's, I have a couple villalobos's in my tree to. I'll see if I can connect my ancestors to these new villalobos's.
Danny C. Alonso
- Log in to post comments
Hola primos,
Here are the ordenes for Diego Yldephonzo Gonzalez de Hermosillo; he was still using the name "Diego Alonso de Hermosillo," and his father had already passed away by 24 Oct 1701.
24 Oct 1701, primera tonsura y cuatro grados: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18376-10366-31?cc=1874591&wc…
12 Feb 1703:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18378-5360-44?cc=1874591&wc=…
All I can say is, I'm happy he decided he didn't have a vocation... or else, many of us wouldn't be here....
Saludos,
Manny Diez Hermosillo
- Log in to post comments
Hola primos,
This is the dispensa for Luis Flores de la Torre and Teresa Muñoz de Hermosillo. 17 Apr 1720, Jalostotitlan, who were are 4o grado, descending from two sisters: Francisca de Torres and Paula de Torres, daughters of Nicolas Ramirez and Polonia de Torres:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18380-12639-27?cc=1874591&wc…
The genealogy given:
Paula de Torres-1-Francisca de Torres
Juana Ramirez-2-Miguel Hermosillo
Juan Flores-3-Cristobal Muñoz
Luis Flores-4-Teresa Muñoz
Relevant to this thread is Paula de Torres, who was married to Diego Alonso del Pedroso y Hermosillo.
“Juana Ramirez” appears in none of the padrones for Jalostotitlan between 1649 and 1679, and I believe the name is incorrect in the dispensa. In the padrones, she was called “Maria de Hermosillo,” and this would be her burial record from 09 Nov 1659, which I think I posted earlier in this thread (right image, bottom, and continues on next image):
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1
- Log in to post comments
Hola primos,
This is the capellania for Beatriz Muñoz de Nava, daughter of Francisco Muñoz de Nava & Maria Sanchez, founded 18 May 1667, in Teocaltiche:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18380-36333-16?cc=1874591&wc…
This is relevant to this thread, because her albaceas were her brother-in-law, Diego Alonso de Hermosillo (m. Luisa de Nava), and Pedro de Guelbes. Since Beatriz had no descendants, the patronage of this capellania passed down through the descendants of Diego Alonso and Luisa de Nava, through their son, Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo (m. Antonia Alvarez Tostado).
I haven’t had a chance to pick it clean, but here’s a summary:
This capellania establishes:
1. That Beatriz Muñoz de Nava was the sister of Luisa Muñoz de Nava (m. Diego Alonso).
2. Properties owned by Beatriz Muñoz de Nava (including homes in Teocaltiche proper, located between those of Diego Alonso and her father, Francisco Muñoz de Nava.
3. That Diego Alonso
- Log in to post comments
Hello Manny what is a Capellania mean?
Danny C. Alonso
- Log in to post comments
Hi Danny,
That is a really good question, with a really complex answer. The best answer I’ve seen is from this page, which you should bookmark: http://www.somosprimos.com/spanishterms/spanishterms.htm
“(1) Chaplaincy of masses established for the soul of a deceased person or persons on a principal sum of money or the value of real property. Its yield of five (5) percent annual interest was paid to the cleric who said the masses. (2) chaplaincy, subsidized by the crown, at a presidio or military headquarters. The beneficiary (priest) was a capelldn or cura castrense.”
In this case, definition (1). From what I can make of it, it was used like a trust fund, for descendants who joined a religious order, to help cover expenses and pay for one’s education. It was one of the methods the Church used to sustain itself.
Relative to our interests, there might be hundreds of pages, with entries made over decades, regarding ownership and administration of a capellania. They are useful in that
- Log in to post comments
Danny,
My Spanish dictionary says that a capellania is a "chaplaincy", I guess where a chaplain lives.
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 15:31:14 -0700
> From: dcalonso97@gmail.com
> To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
> Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Capellania of Beatriz Muñoz de Nava
>
> Hello Manny what is a Capellania mean?
>
> Danny C. Alonso
- Log in to post comments
Hola primos,
These are various capellanias related to the Diego Alonso del Pedroso line. Thanks to Katy Brecht, for indexing these!
Alonso Ramirez de Hermosillo: the mysterious son of Diego Alonso del Pedroso and Paula de Torres, who appears in all of the Jalos padrones between 1649-1679. As far as I can tell, he never married nor had issue, so descendants of his siblings would be capelanes. Establishes that he is brother of Augustin Garcia and Nicolas Ramirez.
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18381-22934-43?cc=1874591&wc…
This is regarding a capellania founded by Josepha Ramirez de Hermosillo, linked to her brother Cristobal Ramirez de Hermosillo. They were children of Nicolas Ramirez de Hermosillo and Francisca Munoz de Barba. On img160 is the testamento of Josepha Ramirez; on img200, there is a great genealogy given:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18381-57648-31?cc=1874591&wc…
- Log in to post comments
Paige,
No, it isn't certain but additional proof would be needed, but there are no records whatsoever that I, or Manny, can find that show Diego Alonso del Pedroso ever used the Ramírez surname, as Manny had pointed out. In order to make that assumption we would need to find a document that does that. Unfortunately, most documents from Jalostotitlán from that period no longer exist. Supposedly they were lost in a fire. There is a book by Sergio Gutiérrez with the padrón from 1650 you can buy at Amazon that supposedly has Diego Alonso del Pedroso with his wife and six of seven of his children. Search for Jalostotitlán at Amazon to find it. Another record to search for is a Cofradía from 1627. Until then the Ramírez surname should be taken off of Diego Alonso del Pedroso because otherwise it is a presumption. Yes, descendants of Diego Alonso could've used Muñoz as descendants of María Muñoz but there are no indications whatsoever that he ever did so his descendants that did use it was
- Log in to post comments
I'm trying to determine what is the correct origin of the González de
Hermosillo. Elsewhere on the forum I've see this:
· Pedro Fernández de Hermosilla
· Alonso de Hermosilla casó a Catalina González hija de Tomás González
· Juan González de Hermosillo c Catalina Ramírez
· Juan González de Hermosillo c Isabel de Escobar hija del Conq. Juan de
Burgos
· Juan González de Hermosillo. Casó a María Muñoz Cabeza de Vaca hija de
Francisco Muñoz y de aquí nació la línea alteña.
Then it seemed as though Juan González de Hermosillo and Ana Rodríguez
Magdaleno were agreed upon as the parents of the Juan González de
Hermosillo that married María Muñoz. But lately, I've seen several websites
list Gonzalo García de Hermosillo as the origin of our González de
Hermosillo.
Since, my Diego Ildefonso Ramírez de Hermosillo uses Ramírez, it makes
sense that the line would travel through Catalina Ramírez and Juan González
de Hermosillo, but I don't know.
Is there anyone in the forum that has a theory
- Log in to post comments
Hi Paige, My name is Robert Gonzalez, I am a direct descendent of Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo, he and Maria Munoz are my 10th great grandparents.
All the research I've done as of late shows Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosillo as Juan's father. ( And a brother of the same name )
I've been working with a very nice gentleman from Spain who is helping me with such questions, but it's been slow going. As you may be aware, Juan was from Guadalcanal, perhaps some of the confusion comes from the origins of the de Hermosilla line. It appears (at the moment ) that the family origins are indeed from the province of Burgos, specifically Ona\Briviesca, of which Hermosilla is a part of. Before of course they made their way south to Guadalcanal. I don't want to jump the gun and give bad info, I need to sort out names and dates, but the line may include members of the military orders of Santiago and the so called Caballeros de Banda de Castilla. I've come across spelling variations, Gunsaliz,Gonzalis
- Log in to post comments
Hi Paige,
There’s been some confusion regarding the origin of the Gonzalez de Hermosillo who proliferated throughout Nueva Galicia. As Robert mentioned, it’s been determined that the line originated with Juan Gonzalez de Hermosilla & Maria Muñoz, from Guadalcanal, Sevilla, and he was the son of Gonzalo Garcia de Hermosilla.
Here’s a link to one discussion on that topic: views:http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/19948
If you descend from the Diego Alonso’s, then the “Ramirez” probably comes from Nicolas Ramirez, whose daughter Paula de Torres married Diego Alonso del Pedroso y Hermosillo. Their offspring used “Ramirez de Hermosillo.” There were 5 Diego Alonso’s, in a direct line, here’s the first four:
Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo & Maria Muñoz m. Guadalcanal, Sevilla antes de Extremadura, España.
http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/es/node/19948#comment-21858
Diego Alonso del Pedroso & Paula Ramirez Torres
Proof of genealogy
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18410-37884-27?cc
- Log in to post comments
Paige,
As Robert and Manny have told you, the paternal line of the González de Hermosillo line in Jalisco, which also spread to nearby Aguascalientes and Zacatecas, begins with Juan González de Hermosillo and María Muñoz from Guadalcanal, Sevilla which is now part of Andalucía, España. The father of Juan González de Hermosillo was Gonzalo García de Hermosillo based on a combination of two different documents that Sergio Gutiérrez very kindly commented on in two different threads pointing out the proof. Manny provided the link to one of those threads which is the one I had on Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno. So you don't have to go looking for it again the link is http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/19948
The reason for me posting this information is so you can understand how those documents prove the ancestry and where in that thread the proof is found even though the full thread is good to have and understanding of how and when the actual genealogy was fully understood by us.
The two
- Log in to post comments
Armando, Manny, Robert,
That was an exhaustive amount of information that clearly proves the
lineage of the Juan González de Hermosillo married to María Muñoz. Gonzalo
García de Hermosillo is definitely the origin of our González de
Hermosillo.
Do we know who this Juan is or how he's connected to our González de
Hermosillo:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-9758-12358-6?cc=1615259&wc=M…
- Log in to post comments
No, we don't know. The fact that he had the same name and assumed to be living in the same time period in Mexico caused people to think that he was the one that was the patriarch of the lineage in Los Altos. In reality they weren't both living in Mexico the whole time. Our Juan González de Hermosillo was living in Spain since his birth sometime before 1562 and 1582. We don't know what happened to the Juan González de Hermosillo born in Mexico City on 8 July 1571.
If you notice in my thread I had provided to you previously at http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/es/node/19948 I ask about Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno, the wife of Juan González de Hermosillo. That is the exact same couple that are the parents of the one that you have a link to in your post. If you go further down in my thread on Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno you will see the information by Daniel much of which you also posted in your first post of this thread that said -
· Pedro Fernández de Hermosilla
· Alonso de Hermosilla casó a
- Log in to post comments
Also, in my post on 2011-10-04 at http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/es/node/19948 I answered Daniel that Guillermo Tovar de Teresa had the parents of Juan González de Hermosillo as Juan González de Hermosillo y Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno (o Madaleno o Ana Hernández) and that he thought that Juan González de Hermosillo was from Guadalcanal based on his post at http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/18947#comment-19622
It wasn't until Sergio's post that I understood that they were different people. In that post he says "Si Juan Glz de Hermosillo es originario de Guadacanal, segun las declaraciones en el documento, como es posible que el haya sido bautizado en Mexico DF en 1572. Creo son homologos y no la misma persona."
Which mean "If Juan Glz de Hermosillo is originally from Guadalcanal, per the declarations in the document, how is it possible that it is the same person that was baptized in 1572. I believe they are of the same name but not the same person."
Armando
- Log in to post comments
Armando,
I understand now. I was a little confused. I had previously read some of
the earlier posts but wasn't quite sure who was being referred to. Also, I
erroneously assumed, that since Juan González de Hermosillo born July 8th,
1571 used the same compound surname that he must be connected to our line.
I had mentioned about some of the Hermosillos use of Ramírez and where that
might have originated from and there was a mention earlier on the
thread about Ramírez coming through Paula de Torres, but, doesn't Paula de
Torres' husband Diego Alonso del Pedroso also occasionally use Ramírez,
which would suggest it originates earlier on the Hermosillo line?
Paige
- Log in to post comments
Paige,
I just realized that there is a marriage record that has important information. Diego Alonso del Pedroso and Paula de Torres had a son that also went by Diego Alonso. He married Luisa Muñoz de Nava 23 Feb 1645 in Teocaltiche and the padrinos were none other than Alonso Ramírez and Paula de Torres. https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19053-2338-11
So now we have a document that show that Diego Alonso del Pedroso married to Paula de Torres did actually use the Ramírez surname, as has been stated by other researchers, and therefore, the use of the Ramírez surname isn't necessarily due to the surname of the father of Paula de Torres.
Unfortunately, there aren't any baptisms of the children of Diego Alonso del Pedroso and Paula de Torres to see which surname he uses in those records. There is also no baptismal, marriage, or death/burial record of Diego Alonso del Pedroso to see which surname was used in those records. None of the other children of Diego Alonso del Pedroso
- Log in to post comments
You know, Armando, I thought the same thing, that their padrinos were his parents. But lately, I'm thinking the madrina, Paula de Torres, might be Diego II's sister. who died a spinster, 18 Oct 1668, in Jalostotitlan:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18450-50208-85?cc=1874591&wc…
I don't know who Alonso Ramirez is.
Here's my take, on the name:
Note, in the header of that marriage record, he is listed as "Diego Alonso" and she as "Luisa de Nava," while in the body, he is listed as "Diego Alonso de Hermosillo." The same formula is used for their son's marriage to Juana Alderete:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19053-3066-6?cc=1874591&wc=M…
From the few primary source documents I've seen (I have none for the 1st), the Diego's are usually listed as "Diego Alonso de Hermosillo," or just "Diego Alonso." I haven't seen them listed as "Diego de Hermosillo," so "Alonso" is the logical surname, and only the Diego's
- Log in to post comments
Manny,
After going back over Retoños de España Tomo VI Volumen 2 pg. 732 it does say in the first paragraph that the Ramírez de Hermosillo surname was taken up due to the marriage of a member of the González de Hermosillo family marrying a daughter of the Ramírez family.
I had concentrated on the Retoños de España Tomo VI Volumen 2 pg. 733 where it states Paula de Torres married "Diego Alonso Ramírez del Pedroso, conocido también con los apellidos González de Hermosillo y del Pedroso y Hermosillo hijo de Juan González de Hermosillo y de María Muñoz, vecinos de la jurisdicción de Jalostotitlán" I had expected Mariano González Leal to have mentioned that the surname Ramírez started with his sons and not with him in that portion if that was the case. However, as I had stated above the first paragraph in on pg. 732 clarifies that it did start with the sons. It sure is strange that Mariano decided to mention he had an alias that included the surname Ramírez when it's the surname given to
- Log in to post comments
Manny, Armando and the rest of primos
I´m also a descendant of Juan González de Hermosillo and have been trying to clarify the ascendants of Juan while with no succes, but at least I have a theory that I would like you to see.
Looking through GENI and some other sites and complementing with PARES information, some other nodes of this forum and even with Wikipedia, I would propose the following:
Pedro Fernández de Hermosillo born around 1440 who was the father of
Alonso de Hermosillo born around 1465, who married Catalina González around 1485 that´s where the compound last name begins.
This couple is mentioned in the document of 1515 of Juan Gonzáles de Hermosillo to come to Indias where he states to be 20 years old, so he was born around 1495.
For now I suppose that this Juan González de Hermosillo married Catalina Ramírez del Pedroso around 1518 and that they had the folowing children :
Gonzalo González García de Hermosillo bca 1520 married ca1550 Isabel Escobar
Diego González
- Log in to post comments
Carlos,
The genealogy you posted is the incorrect genealogy. That is what my posts have been about. The person that married María Muñoz was married and living in Guadalcanal, Spain in 1582 when Gonzalo García Hermosillo asked to bring his brother. He could not have been born 8 Julio 1571 en Cd de Mexico to Juan González de Hermosillo and Ana Rodriguez de Madaleno. This was pointed out by Sergio Gutiérrez and it is also pointed out by in the 2011 edition of Retoños de España Tomo IV Vol. 1 pages 209-211.
Please reread my previous posts in this thread and the links contained in the posts and download the original documents so you can see that the genealogy you posted is the incorrect genealogy.
To clarify, if he was married and living in Guadalcanal, Spain in 1582 how could his paternal grandparents have been Gonzalo González García de Hermosillo bca 1520 married ca1550 to Isabel Escobar if the parents of Gonzalo González García de Hermosillo bca 1520 were Juan González de Hermosillo
- Log in to post comments
Armando
I´ve seen all the previous posts and I agree that Juan González de Hermosillo the one who marries Ana María Muñóz IS NOT the son of Juan González de Hermosillo and Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno.
I´m saying ,based in the fact that we already know that the granfather of OUR Juan González was named Gonzalo González de Hermosillo, and that he must have been born around 1520, that this is THE GONZALO THAT MARRIED ISABEL DE ESCOBAR around 1550, and they were able to have:
Gonzalo GARCÍA DE HERMOSILLO bca 1550 (who asks permission for his brother Juan to come to America)
Juan bca 1555 who comes to America in 1582)
Now, I propose that the parents of the first Gonzalo González de Hermosillo were the conqueror Juan González de Hermosillo (who came in 1515) and Catalina Ramírez del Pedroso married ca 1518.
Besides Gonzalo González de Hermosillo they are the likely parents of :
Catalina GARCÍA HERMOSILLO born 1521 who married Diego Gavilán; Catalina García de Hermosillo would be then Aunt
- Log in to post comments
I made a mistake in one paragraph and the correct form should say :
Catalina GARCÍA HERMOSILLO born 1521 who married Diego Gavilán; Catalina García de Hermosillo would be then Aunt of GONZALO GARCÍA DE HERMOSILLO the brother of OUR Juan..........we must notice that they both USE THE LAST NAME "GARCÍA"
What is CLEAR about this last couple is that they ARE THE GRANDPARENTS of the BISHOP of Nueva Vizcaya : Gonzalo González de Hermosillo y Rodríguez Madaleno bca 1560, whose approval as bishop is dated 27-feb-1620 (PARES).
- Log in to post comments
Carlos,
Your hypothesis still does not fit with the information that we have. I will try and clarify why that is, without using caps.
First of all, we don't know what the name of the grandfather of OUR Juan González de Hermosillo was named. We only know that his father was named Gonzalo González de Hermosillo.
We know that our Juan González de Hermosillo was married with children in 1582 therefore he was married at least 20 months prior to 1582. Since most people marry past 18 years of old even back then he is at least 20 years old making his birth year between 1532 and 1562. Therefore, his father Gonzalo García de Hermosillo was born in Spain anywhere between 1500 and 1544.
That is all we know about our Juan González de Hermosillo. We don't have any idea who his mother was or who his grandparents were. There is absolutely no evidence that the "Gonzalo González de Hermosillo" that married Isabel de Escobar was the grandfather of our Juan González de Hermosillo. Asserting that is
- Log in to post comments
Hi Armando,
Thank you for the clarification, I don't want to lead anybody down the wrong path. I should have mentioned, my "Alonso" surname theory is conjecture, based on documents I've seen. I haven't had access to "Retonos," some day I need to make arrangements. I was totally unaware that Diego Alonso de Hermosillo also married Maria de Renteria y Orosco.
This is regarding the IV, Diego Yldephonzo Gonzalez de Hermosillo, who was married to Lorenza Manuela Cabrera:
I've found the following at Acervos Coloniales Siglos XVII A XIX (http://sigue.aguascalientes.gob.mx/axweb/):
On 20 Aug 1721, while living in Asientos, Aguascalientes, Diego Yldephonzo Gonzalez de Hermosillo and Lorenza Manuela de Cabrera sold el Puesto de Atenguillo, in Cuquio, Jalisco, to Alejo Plasencia (along with a lot in Cuquio), for 270 pesos. Atenguillo was owned by Lorenza Manuela's father, Antonio Cabrera, and they sold it on behalf of his heirs: Lorenza and her 2 brothers, Clemente Manuel Cabrera and Cayetano
- Log in to post comments
Manny,
It's always good to bring up conjecture so that we can try and find out if the alternatives are a possibility.
Armando
- Log in to post comments
Armando, Manny
I must be suffering from information overload because I've seen that
marriage of Diego Alonso Ramírez de Hermosillo and Luisa Muñoz before and
never noticed the padrinos were his parents. Or, individuals with similar
names. I don't know when the sister was born, so I couldn't say for sure. I
did however notice the margin just said Diego Alonso and did at one point
think that might be part of the surname. For whatever reason, I quickly
dismissed that idea.
Paige
- Log in to post comments
Paige,
I am no longer considering the padrinos to be the parents, even though Paula could be the mother, since Retoños de España does say the the Ramírez surname was taken up by due to the marriage with Paula de Torres, which means her husband never actually used the surname.
Armando
- Log in to post comments
Armando,
Is it certain that Alonso Ramírez is not Diego Alonso Ramírez del Pedroso.
I was looking at the records and the couple Paula de Torres and Diego
Alonso Ramírez del Pedroso seem to fit as padrinos. Even if the Ramírez de
Hermosillo was created by the union of Paula de Torres and Diego Alonso
Ramírez del Pedroso, that doesn't eliminate the possibility that Diego
Alonso also could be a Ramírez. Just as the Muñoz González de Hermosillo
was created by the union of Luisa Muñoz de Nava and Diego Alonso González
de Hermosillo, but, in theory, Diego Alonso could've used Muñoz himself as
a descendant of María Muñoz.
Also because the names get confusing, I wanted to check something. I've
seen Luisa Muñoz de Nava married to both a Diego Alonso González de
Hermosillo and a Diego Ildefonso Ramírez de Hermosillo, are they the same
person?
Paige
- Log in to post comments
Hi Paige,
I do believe the Paula de Torres mentioned is the wife of Diego Alonso del Pedroso. If you look at this site: http://gw.geneanet.org/sanchiz?lang=es&p=diego+alonso&n=ramirez+del+ped…; the younger Paula de Torres is listed as being born in 1643. Even If you just try to piece together when everyone was born based on their marriages and such and you look at all their children, including, Nicolás Ramírez de Hermosillo and Agustín García de Hermosillo that married the two Muñoz de la Barba sisters, and Juana Ramírez de Hermosillo that married Pedro Flores de la Torre, as well as, Diego Alonso himself that married Luisa Muñoz de Nava, I doubt the younger Paula de Torres, was born any earlier than 1640. My guess is she was too young to be madrina at a wedding in 1645. Therefore, I think the Paula de Torres mentioned is most likely the wife of Diego Alonso del Pedroso. As for the Alonso Ramirez mentioned, Armando would be better able to answer that.
Also, Diego Alonso González
- Log in to post comments
Armando,
I will look for that book today. Are there other genealogy books related to
our research area that I can order from Amazon?
Paige
- Log in to post comments
Paige,
The only other books that I know of at Amazon pertaining to our region of research are also by Sergio Gutiérrez. If you have ancestors from Lagos de Moreno and are interested in the books by Mario Gómez Mata you can contact him through Facebook (Gomez Mata Mario) or I can send you his email. The books that he has for sale are:
1.- La Alcaldía Mayor de Lagos, conquista y colonización de Pechititán
2.- Bautismos, defunciones y matrimonios del primer siglo de Santa María de los Lagos (1583-1663) que contiene todos los nombres y apellidos de españoles, indios, africanso y castas que nacieron, casaron y murieron en Lagos, hasta antes del año 1663.
3.- Iglesias virreinales de Santa María de los Lagos, con cuatro estudios de los que su servidor es autor del correpsondiente al templo del Rosario. Edición de lujo con papel lustre y fotografáis a color
4.- La esclavitud en Santa María de los Lagos siglos XVI-XIX.
5.- Relevo patronal en lagos. De san Sebastián a Nuestro Padre
- Log in to post comments
Armando
I´m sorry I mixed terms in my proposal (not assertion), I meant to say that now is clear that the name of the father of OUR Juna González is Gonzalo, and then I (based on other websites) suggested that the wife of that Gonzalo was Isabel de Escobar Burgos.
Now I´ve seen that the husband of Isabel de Escobar was Juan Ramírez as you say is mentioned in "Retoños", but also in a very interesting "información" that the "Escobar" brothers raised in 1577 where they declare they are the children of Juan de Burgos and that they are poor in spite of their father being a "conquistador" who contributed largely to the conquest; the información explains that Juan de Burgos was owner of a Navío full of "bastimentos" with which he helped greatly to the conquest.
In that información is clearly mentioned the name of the husband of Isabel as Juan Ramírez.
I just found another very interesting document which I´m trying to read and is another INFORMACION asked by Francisco González de
- Log in to post comments
The información I just mentioned is a little bit confusing and I think the right name of the parents of Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno are Gonzalo Rodríguez Magdaleno and María Hernández.
I mean, on page 5 of the document those are the names mentioned, later in the same document it seems to me that they mix the names of the brother in law of Francisco González de Hermosillo (Juan Rodríguez de León married to Leonor G de H known as "de la Parra" ) with María Hernández.
- Log in to post comments
Armando
Precisely in the información I´m talking about, is attached an información that was previously gestioned by Juan González de Hermosillo (brother of Francisco)know there as "El Mozo" , son of Juan G de H and Ana R Magdaleno, that información was made "por poder" en la villa de Guadalcanal in 1584 and one of the two "apoderados" of Juan was Francisco Ramírez who is declared as "primo" of "El Mozo".
I have to correct the name of the grandfather of Francisco an Juan and now I clearly see that the correct name was Gonzalo García de Hermosillo.
I´m almost sure so far that this "Mozo" is the one that went to Nueva Galicia, and that he s not the same that was baptized on 1571 by the same parents because he couldn´t be doing that información in 1584 at 13 years of age; I think for some reason there´s another Juan in 1571 or the date is erroneous and should be 1541.
- Log in to post comments
My take on the document is changing continously as long as I read it.
Th informacion of Francisco was betweeen 1606 and 1607 but it contains another información made on 1584 and it was made on behalf of Juan González de Hermosillo "El viejo" not "El Mozo". It is so because the witnesses are questioned if they knew Gonzalo garcía de Hermosillo and Leonor Parra parents of Juan, and that Juan was born in Guadalcanal but is "vecino in 1584" of Mexico City.
- Log in to post comments
I´m not yet done with that "información" but so far I have the following :
Gonzalo García Hermosillo married Leonor Sánchez Parra and were the parents of
Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo born in Guadalcanal who travels to Mexico in 1582
and "por poder" asks an "información" to be made by his cousin Fco Ramírez 1584
this Juan marries ca 1558 Ana Rodríguez Magdaleno and thay have the following children :
Leonor 1559
Catalina 1561
Gonzalo 1562 (Bishop)
Juan 1571
María ca 1565
Then in a second wedding in Nueva Galicia :
Juan Gonzalez de Hermosillo born in Guadalcanal who travels to Mexico in 1582
and "por poder" asks an "información" to be made by his cousin Fco Ramírez 1584
this Juan marries ca 1589 Ana María Muñóz and thay have the following children :
Theresa b 1589
Leonor bca 1590
Juan 1591
Beatríz b 1593
Diego b 1598
Francisco bca 1599
Cristóbal bca 1600
- Log in to post comments
Regarding the padrinos of the marriage for Diego Alonso de Hermosillo and Luisa de Nava: as has been noted, we can't be sure that the padrinos, Alonso Ramirez and Paula de Torres, are the parents of the groom (Paula de Torres, still a possibility). I did an indexed search at FamilySearch for an "Alonso Ramirez" who'd fit the place & timeline, but nothing comes up in Teocaltiche, or early enough to consider. This will require sifting through the Teocaltiche and nearby parishes, to see if "Alonso Ramirez" appears anywhere else.
Armando: In "Retonos," does Don Mariano have siblings for Nicolas Ramirez, who was married to Polonia de Torres? Is Alonso Ramirez possibly his brother? Or even another son of Nicolas Ramirez and Polonia de Torres?
PAULA DE TORRES
Regarding the 1668 burial of Paula de Torres, hija de Paula de Torres, that I shared in an earlier post:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18450-50208-85?cc=1874591&wc…
I do not have
- Log in to post comments
Manny,
I had abandoned the padrino Alonso Ramírez as also being the father of Diego Alonso de Hermosillo some time ago. He was probably a sibling or other relative of Paula de Torres. However, the dates are a better fit for the madrina being the mother of Diego Alonso de Hermosillo.
The Diego Alonso de Hermosillo that married Maria de Renteria y Orosco en segundas nupcias was the widower of Luisa Muñoz.
There isn't an Alonso Ramirez mentioned in Retoños de España as a sibling or other to Paula de Torres but there are lots of records missing so it is possible that he was a sibling to Paula de Torres.
Armando
- Log in to post comments
Christopher,
I agree that the Paula de Torres that died 18 Oct 1668 in Jalostotitlán would have been too young to have been a madrina at her brother's wedding in 1645, not just because of the date on Geneanet but also because the record states that she died a doncella which means young maiden or young virgin. Since a lot of women didn't marry until the mid-twenties at that time the term doncella would have still been valid. The Paula de Torres at the wedding of Diego Alonso de Hermosillo in 1645 was definitely the mother.
Armando
- Log in to post comments
Wow you're research is amazing! Welcome to Nuestros Ranchos and you are obviously a wonderful addition.
Linda Castanon-Long in B.C.
________________________________
From: Manny Diez
To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 8:17 AM
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] New Member Introduction and request for assistance on Gonzalez de Hermosillo
First of all, I want to thank all of you for all of the amazing work you've
done: when I began this project at the beginning of the summer, I saved my
maternal grandfather's ancestry for last, because I assumed it would be the
most difficult. We don't know much about our patriarch, J. Refugio G.
Hermosillo, before he crossed the border in 1926; he was 43 at the time,
and had already lived a lifetime. We had no contact with his family, his
parents and siblings dying long before we were born. All we knew was that
he was from a small town in Zacatecas called Montesa, and that, according
to him, he descended from one of
- Log in to post comments
Welcome Primo...and BRAVO for the best intro I've seen here.
- Log in to post comments

New Member Introduction and