Comment
Hello, When I do research, i do my research in two parts. First, I search the IGI using batch numbers, marriage searches, parent searches, etc. In order to Identify, who I will be looking for on the films. Then I enter all the information that I have found that identifies the film, such as town, film numbers, record type, time period, Batch number, and if the film is in the FHL or in the vault. Then I enter all the dates and names that I want from the film. Here is a example: (**** Attn: Linda Romero **** this is what I recommend for you, to research) Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico 0038332 Bautismos 1820-1824 C603166 FHL 15 Feb 1823 Maria Faustina Torre Padilla 1107895 Bautismos 1826-1831 C602542 FHL 14 Aug 1827 Ma. Atanazia Torres Tepatitlan de Morelos, Jalisco, Mexico 0218447 Bautismos 1810-1816 C603699 FHL 04 Dec 1814 Jose Saturnino Torre Padilla 0218448 Bautismos 1816-1821 C603701 FHL 17 Apr 1819 Jose Franco. Torre Padilla 21 Mar 1821 Maria Matilde Torre Padilla 0218450 Bautismos 1824-1826 J&K603703 FHL 11 Jun 1826 Maxima de Jesus Torre Padilla 0218451 Bautismos 1827-1829 C603704 Vault 02 Jun 1828 Maria Merced de la Torre Padilla 0218452 Bautismos 1829-1832 C027660 Vault 21 Feb 1832 Juliana de la Torre 0218461 Bautismos 1855-1857 C603715 Vault 19 Aug 1856 Maria Elena Romero Barajas 0218467 Bautismos 1870-1872 C603722 FHL 07 Oct 1871 Jose Marcos Romero Torre 0218475 Bautismos 1889-1892 I048690 FHL 14 Aug 1890 Maria Emilia Romero 0218519 Matrimonios 1787-1817 M603728 FHL 16 Feb 1814 Antonio de la Torre & Maria del Carmen Padilla 0218529 Matrimonios 1869-1876 M603739 FHL 19 Oct 1870 Manuel Romero & Marcelina de la Torre 0218530 Matrimonios 1876-1881 M603741 Vault 04 Feb 1880 Jose de la Torre & Elena Romero 0218567 Informacion Matrimonial 1870-1871 FHL HD 19 Oct 1870 Manuel Romero & Marcelina de la Torre 0218575 Informacion Matrimonial 1879-1882 FHL 04 Feb 1880 Jose de la Torre & Elena Romero Then, I go and search the films, and as I find what I am looking for. I highlight, so that I know that I have found that record. Thanks, Jonathan --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Erlinda Castanon-Long" <longsjourney@y...> wrote: > > I have started using the batch numbers to do the groundwork before > going to the FHC to read the actual films. There are so many > entries that are smeared or too light to read that having them read > by someone else has been a Godsend. In doing marriage records for > Tamazula the online batch # gave me a marriage for my ancestor > Benito Gutierrez that I never would have been able to read on my > own. I allow for misspelled names and missing dates. There are > times when I know I will have to order the film a second time but > when time is an issue pulling all the surnames I'm researching with > the % and a surname has saved the day more than once. Now when I go > to read the film I've already started my record with dates and names > in sequence so I do them first and then go back and do the complete > record a second time. I always order at least 2 films because one > usually is being used by someone else and I've waited up to 2 months > for a film to arrive or as little as 8 days. > My husband is a contract worker so we've lived in 12 states in the > last 10 years so there are times when I am trying to get as much > information for my family lines as possible so time and availability > can sometimes be an issue for me. If I'm in an area where there is > no history center I have my groundwork done with the batch #'s and > ready to go the next time I'm lucky enough to find a city with a > center. > Any other tips to help use the resources available to us? > Linda in Everett >
- Log in to post comments
Comment
Linda, FYI, there is a free edition of Legacy Family Tree software. http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/ It lacks some of the functions of the Deluxe Edition but it still does so much, including the report I wrote about. Victor --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Erlinda Castanon-Long" <longsjourney@y...> wrote: > > Victor, thank you for your tips, I've been told Legacy is the > Cadillac of genealogy softwear and I will keep it in mind as my next > purchase of genealogy tools. My computer skills are limited and it's > a learn as I go project. I just started using the Family Tree > program that allows me to put in people who are not related to each > other so that when I can tie in a line I only have to merge them, > what a blessing that has been! > thanks again, Linda > > --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "v.h.villarreal" > <raices_regias@y...> wrote: > > > > Linda, > > > > I have developed a somewhat similar system but I make use of a > > function built into my genealogy software (Legacy) where I print > out a > > "source citation report". Of course this requires that everytime > you > > find a record on the IGI and make an entry in your genealogy > database > > that you record the batch number AND the date of the event as a > source. > > > > With your source citation report on hand you just sort by > > chronological order the entries grouped by source (batch number). > > Then, when you get a chance to review the microfilm of each batch > > number you just locate each date from your report in a forward > > sequence, take a picture (or transcribe the manuscript) and move to > > the next, etc. > > > > The ideal thing would be to read the whole book from start to > finish > > but the circumstances usually make it impractical if not > impossible. > > This is a very efficient method to get your records fast. Let's > say > > you need some 20 or 30 records from a microfilm you can get them in > > about an hour. > > > > Hope this helps someone. The key is entering the batch number and > the > > event's date with each ancestor record, and then use your > software. > > The question is if the software you're using has this reporting > > capability. > > > > Victor Villarreal > > Reynosa, Mexico > > > > --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Erlinda Castanon-Long" > > <longsjourney@y...> wrote: > > > > > > I have started using the batch numbers to do the groundwork > before > > > going to the FHC to read the actual films. There are so many > > > entries that are smeared or too light to read that having them > read > > > by someone else has been a Godsend. In doing marriage records > for > > > Tamazula the online batch # gave me a marriage for my ancestor > > > Benito Gutierrez that I never would have been able to read on my > > > own. I allow for misspelled names and missing dates. There are > > > times when I know I will have to order the film a second time > but > > > when time is an issue pulling all the surnames I'm researching > with > > > the % and a surname has saved the day more than once. Now when I > go > > > to read the film I've already started my record with dates and > names > > > in sequence so I do them first and then go back and do the > complete > > > record a second time. I always order at least 2 films because > one > > > usually is being used by someone else and I've waited up to 2 > months > > > for a film to arrive or as little as 8 days. > > > My husband is a contract worker so we've lived in 12 states in > the > > > last 10 years so there are times when I am trying to get as much > > > information for my family lines as possible so time and > availability > > > can sometimes be an issue for me. If I'm in an area where there > is > > > no history center I have my groundwork done with the batch #'s > and > > > ready to go the next time I'm lucky enough to find a city with a > > > center. > > > Any other tips to help use the resources available to us? > > > Linda in Everett > > > > > >
- Log in to post comments
Comment
Victor, thank you for your tips, I've been told Legacy is the Cadillac of genealogy softwear and I will keep it in mind as my next purchase of genealogy tools. My computer skills are limited and it's a learn as I go project. I just started using the Family Tree program that allows me to put in people who are not related to each other so that when I can tie in a line I only have to merge them, what a blessing that has been! thanks again, Linda --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "v.h.villarreal" <raices_regias@y...> wrote: > > Linda, > > I have developed a somewhat similar system but I make use of a > function built into my genealogy software (Legacy) where I print out a > "source citation report". Of course this requires that everytime you > find a record on the IGI and make an entry in your genealogy database > that you record the batch number AND the date of the event as a source. > > With your source citation report on hand you just sort by > chronological order the entries grouped by source (batch number). > Then, when you get a chance to review the microfilm of each batch > number you just locate each date from your report in a forward > sequence, take a picture (or transcribe the manuscript) and move to > the next, etc. > > The ideal thing would be to read the whole book from start to finish > but the circumstances usually make it impractical if not impossible. > This is a very efficient method to get your records fast. Let's say > you need some 20 or 30 records from a microfilm you can get them in > about an hour. > > Hope this helps someone. The key is entering the batch number and the > event's date with each ancestor record, and then use your software. > The question is if the software you're using has this reporting > capability. > > Victor Villarreal > Reynosa, Mexico > > --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Erlinda Castanon-Long" > <longsjourney@y...> wrote: > > > > I have started using the batch numbers to do the groundwork before > > going to the FHC to read the actual films. There are so many > > entries that are smeared or too light to read that having them read > > by someone else has been a Godsend. In doing marriage records for > > Tamazula the online batch # gave me a marriage for my ancestor > > Benito Gutierrez that I never would have been able to read on my > > own. I allow for misspelled names and missing dates. There are > > times when I know I will have to order the film a second time but > > when time is an issue pulling all the surnames I'm researching with > > the % and a surname has saved the day more than once. Now when I go > > to read the film I've already started my record with dates and names > > in sequence so I do them first and then go back and do the complete > > record a second time. I always order at least 2 films because one > > usually is being used by someone else and I've waited up to 2 months > > for a film to arrive or as little as 8 days. > > My husband is a contract worker so we've lived in 12 states in the > > last 10 years so there are times when I am trying to get as much > > information for my family lines as possible so time and availability > > can sometimes be an issue for me. If I'm in an area where there is > > no history center I have my groundwork done with the batch #'s and > > ready to go the next time I'm lucky enough to find a city with a > > center. > > Any other tips to help use the resources available to us? > > Linda in Everett > > >
- Log in to post comments
Comment
Linda, I have developed a somewhat similar system but I make use of a function built into my genealogy software (Legacy) where I print out a "source citation report". Of course this requires that everytime you find a record on the IGI and make an entry in your genealogy database that you record the batch number AND the date of the event as a source. With your source citation report on hand you just sort by chronological order the entries grouped by source (batch number). Then, when you get a chance to review the microfilm of each batch number you just locate each date from your report in a forward sequence, take a picture (or transcribe the manuscript) and move to the next, etc. The ideal thing would be to read the whole book from start to finish but the circumstances usually make it impractical if not impossible. This is a very efficient method to get your records fast. Let's say you need some 20 or 30 records from a microfilm you can get them in about an hour. Hope this helps someone. The key is entering the batch number and the event's date with each ancestor record, and then use your software. The question is if the software you're using has this reporting capability. Victor Villarreal Reynosa, Mexico --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Erlinda Castanon-Long" <longsjourney@y...> wrote: > > I have started using the batch numbers to do the groundwork before > going to the FHC to read the actual films. There are so many > entries that are smeared or too light to read that having them read > by someone else has been a Godsend. In doing marriage records for > Tamazula the online batch # gave me a marriage for my ancestor > Benito Gutierrez that I never would have been able to read on my > own. I allow for misspelled names and missing dates. There are > times when I know I will have to order the film a second time but > when time is an issue pulling all the surnames I'm researching with > the % and a surname has saved the day more than once. Now when I go > to read the film I've already started my record with dates and names > in sequence so I do them first and then go back and do the complete > record a second time. I always order at least 2 films because one > usually is being used by someone else and I've waited up to 2 months > for a film to arrive or as little as 8 days. > My husband is a contract worker so we've lived in 12 states in the > last 10 years so there are times when I am trying to get as much > information for my family lines as possible so time and availability > can sometimes be an issue for me. If I'm in an area where there is > no history center I have my groundwork done with the batch #'s and > ready to go the next time I'm lucky enough to find a city with a > center. > Any other tips to help use the resources available to us? > Linda in Everett >
- Log in to post comments

Reply