Comentario
Susana and Arturo, Read my message about ADABI. How about contacting that group and ask them to consider these records for a project? Maria --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Arturo Ramos" <arturo.ramos2@v...> wrote: > > Susana: > > If you read my previous message you will note that there are in fact > a great deal of records at the Inmaculada parrish in Jerez that are > not filmed... Leonardo de la Torre Berumen has transcribed a great > deal of these records but filming them would also be valuable. I > don't know if it is going to be possible given the condition that > they are in and according to Leonardo make them difficult to film and > is perhaps the reason why they passed them up in the first place. > > There are also records in Colotlan that are not filmed. The priest > there is obstinate about not allowing access so it would require > permission from the bishop in Zacatecas. If you are interested in > pushing this forward, I would be willing to help. > > --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Susana Leniski" <susyfarias@c...> > wrote: > > > > To anyone researching in La Inmaculada/Jerez, Zacatecas > > > > I have some information that can be valuable for anyone researching > in Jerez > > > > 1. THE CASE OF THE 20-25 PAGES OF MARRIAGES > > > > The first time I reviewed the film # 440059. Matrimonios 1712- 1745. > I noticed that the film started in the middle of the book. I searched > for the missing pages until I found them. They are in the previous > film. Film # 440058. Informacion Matrimonial 1961. Yes, you read > right 1961. In this film after the 1961 information, all the way at > the end of the film.( You even pass a section in "blank".) There is > the first roll of film of marriages. There are about 20-25 pages of > the oldest marriages in microfilm for Jerez (1712), part of the 1st > book.I already spoke to the expert for Latin-American in the main > Library in Utah (that was 2 years ago). I hope they will place a note > in the Library Catalogue in the near future. > > > > 2. THE CASE OF THE MISSING MICROFILMS > > > > Recently I spoke over the phone to the person in charge of the > archives in the Church La Inmaculada in Jerez, Zacatecas. He told me > that the oldest Marriage that they have is 1697 and Marriage > Information November 3, 1665. As we know in the LDS Library Catalogue > the marriages start in 1712 (missing 15 years) and in Marriage > Information 1789 (missing 124 years). He speculated that when they > did the microfilming of the records (around 1960) they asked for the > church "books", and all these information are "single sheets-hojas > sueltas). During my conversation with him he was flipping the actual > documents. At the same time, I felt my heart was flipping. I could > see the long lost marriage, my brick wall in that bundle of papers. I > already wrote 2 e-mails to the AGN (Archivo General de la Nacion), > but I haven't received a response.I also called the main Library in > Utah with this information. I spoke to the same expert, and she took > some notes. I have my doubts that my petition for microfilming was > forward. Does anyone know where I can petition formally the > microfilming of these records? What can we do? > > I also asked in the church in Jerez if the archives were open to > the public. I was told that access can be granted thru the Dioceses > of Zacatecas (or Archdioceses). I don't know if you can petition for > this on-line. I'm hoping I will be able to go to Jerez next year and > search in the archives of the church. But, I think we should > preserved this documents for future genealogist. > > > > Sincerely, > > Susana Leniski > > >
- Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios
Comentario
Arturo Ramos
wrote:
wrote:
"Susana
Leniski stated: I also called the main Library in
Utah with this
information. I spoke to the same expert, and she took
some notes. I have my
doubts that my petition for microfilming was
forward. Does anyone know where
I can petition formally the
microfilming of these records? What can we
do?"
Leniski stated: I also called the main Library in
Utah with this
information. I spoke to the same expert, and she took
some notes. I have my
doubts that my petition for microfilming was
forward. Does anyone know where
I can petition formally the
microfilming of these records? What can we
do?"
class=592400120-05012006>
Hi to
all!
all!
class=592400120-05012006>
I am a little
late but want to wish everyone the very best in 2006!
late but want to wish everyone the very best in 2006!
class=592400120-05012006>
In trying to
catch up with my e-mail I found the message above from Arturo Ramos and I have a
suggestion:
catch up with my e-mail I found the message above from Arturo Ramos and I have a
suggestion:
class=592400120-05012006>
class=592400120-05012006> When I was in Salt Lake City in
October, 2003 I met Karen A. Jepson, Community Relations Specialist of the
Family & Church History Dept. at the FHC. Her department handles
microfilming. Her e-mail address is:
href="mailto:jepsonka@...">jepsonka@...
I do not know who
Susana Leniske spoke to but it would not hurt to try this
route.
Susana Leniske spoke to but it would not hurt to try this
route.
face="Courier New">
Josie in San
Antonio
Antonio
- Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios
Comentario
Arturo Ramos
wrote:
wrote:
"Susana
Leniski stated: I also called the main Library in
Utah with this
information. I spoke to the same expert, and she took
some notes. I have my
doubts that my petition for microfilming was
forward. Does anyone know where
I can petition formally the
microfilming of these records? What can we
do?"
Leniski stated: I also called the main Library in
Utah with this
information. I spoke to the same expert, and she took
some notes. I have my
doubts that my petition for microfilming was
forward. Does anyone know where
I can petition formally the
microfilming of these records? What can we
do?"
class=592400120-05012006>
Hi to
all!
all!
class=592400120-05012006>
I am a little
late but want to wish everyone the very best in 2006!
late but want to wish everyone the very best in 2006!
class=592400120-05012006>
In trying to
catch up with my e-mail I found the message above from Arturo Ramos and I have a
suggestion:
catch up with my e-mail I found the message above from Arturo Ramos and I have a
suggestion:
class=592400120-05012006>
class=592400120-05012006> When I was in Salt Lake City in
October, 2003 I met Karen A. Jepson, Community Relations Specialist of the
Family & Church History Dept. at the FHC. Her department handles
microfilming. Her e-mail address is:
href="mailto:jepsonka@...">jepsonka@...
I do not know who
Susana Leniske spoke to but it would not hurt to try this
route.
Susana Leniske spoke to but it would not hurt to try this
route.
face="Courier New">
Josie in San
Antonio
Antonio
- Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios
Comentario
Susana: If you read my previous message you will note that there are in fact a great deal of records at the Inmaculada parrish in Jerez that are not filmed... Leonardo de la Torre Berumen has transcribed a great deal of these records but filming them would also be valuable. I don't know if it is going to be possible given the condition that they are in and according to Leonardo make them difficult to film and is perhaps the reason why they passed them up in the first place. There are also records in Colotlan that are not filmed. The priest there is obstinate about not allowing access so it would require permission from the bishop in Zacatecas. If you are interested in pushing this forward, I would be willing to help. --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Susana Leniski" <susyfarias@c...> wrote: > > To anyone researching in La Inmaculada/Jerez, Zacatecas > > I have some information that can be valuable for anyone researching in Jerez > > 1. THE CASE OF THE 20-25 PAGES OF MARRIAGES > > The first time I reviewed the film # 440059. Matrimonios 1712-1745. I noticed that the film started in the middle of the book. I searched for the missing pages until I found them. They are in the previous film. Film # 440058. Informacion Matrimonial 1961. Yes, you read right 1961. In this film after the 1961 information, all the way at the end of the film.( You even pass a section in "blank".) There is the first roll of film of marriages. There are about 20-25 pages of the oldest marriages in microfilm for Jerez (1712), part of the 1st book.I already spoke to the expert for Latin-American in the main Library in Utah (that was 2 years ago). I hope they will place a note in the Library Catalogue in the near future. > > 2. THE CASE OF THE MISSING MICROFILMS > > Recently I spoke over the phone to the person in charge of the archives in the Church La Inmaculada in Jerez, Zacatecas. He told me that the oldest Marriage that they have is 1697 and Marriage Information November 3, 1665. As we know in the LDS Library Catalogue the marriages start in 1712 (missing 15 years) and in Marriage Information 1789 (missing 124 years). He speculated that when they did the microfilming of the records (around 1960) they asked for the church "books", and all these information are "single sheets-hojas sueltas). During my conversation with him he was flipping the actual documents. At the same time, I felt my heart was flipping. I could see the long lost marriage, my brick wall in that bundle of papers. I already wrote 2 e-mails to the AGN (Archivo General de la Nacion), but I haven't received a response.I also called the main Library in Utah with this information. I spoke to the same expert, and she took some notes. I have my doubts that my petition for microfilming was forward. Does anyone know where I can petition formally the microfilming of these records? What can we do? > I also asked in the church in Jerez if the archives were open to the public. I was told that access can be granted thru the Dioceses of Zacatecas (or Archdioceses). I don't know if you can petition for this on-line. I'm hoping I will be able to go to Jerez next year and search in the archives of the church. But, I think we should preserved this documents for future genealogist. > > Sincerely, > Susana Leniski >
- Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios
Comentario
Susana: If you read my previous message you will note that there are in fact a great deal of records at the Inmaculada parrish in Jerez that are not filmed... Leonardo de la Torre Berumen has transcribed a great deal of these records but filming them would also be valuable. I don't know if it is going to be possible given the condition that they are in and according to Leonardo make them difficult to film and is perhaps the reason why they passed them up in the first place. There are also records in Colotlan that are not filmed. The priest there is obstinate about not allowing access so it would require permission from the bishop in Zacatecas. If you are interested in pushing this forward, I would be willing to help. --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Susana Leniski" <susyfarias@c...> wrote: > > To anyone researching in La Inmaculada/Jerez, Zacatecas > > I have some information that can be valuable for anyone researching in Jerez > > 1. THE CASE OF THE 20-25 PAGES OF MARRIAGES > > The first time I reviewed the film # 440059. Matrimonios 1712-1745. I noticed that the film started in the middle of the book. I searched for the missing pages until I found them. They are in the previous film. Film # 440058. Informacion Matrimonial 1961. Yes, you read right 1961. In this film after the 1961 information, all the way at the end of the film.( You even pass a section in "blank".) There is the first roll of film of marriages. There are about 20-25 pages of the oldest marriages in microfilm for Jerez (1712), part of the 1st book.I already spoke to the expert for Latin-American in the main Library in Utah (that was 2 years ago). I hope they will place a note in the Library Catalogue in the near future. > > 2. THE CASE OF THE MISSING MICROFILMS > > Recently I spoke over the phone to the person in charge of the archives in the Church La Inmaculada in Jerez, Zacatecas. He told me that the oldest Marriage that they have is 1697 and Marriage Information November 3, 1665. As we know in the LDS Library Catalogue the marriages start in 1712 (missing 15 years) and in Marriage Information 1789 (missing 124 years). He speculated that when they did the microfilming of the records (around 1960) they asked for the church "books", and all these information are "single sheets-hojas sueltas). During my conversation with him he was flipping the actual documents. At the same time, I felt my heart was flipping. I could see the long lost marriage, my brick wall in that bundle of papers. I already wrote 2 e-mails to the AGN (Archivo General de la Nacion), but I haven't received a response.I also called the main Library in Utah with this information. I spoke to the same expert, and she took some notes. I have my doubts that my petition for microfilming was forward. Does anyone know where I can petition formally the microfilming of these records? What can we do? > I also asked in the church in Jerez if the archives were open to the public. I was told that access can be granted thru the Dioceses of Zacatecas (or Archdioceses). I don't know if you can petition for this on-line. I'm hoping I will be able to go to Jerez next year and search in the archives of the church. But, I think we should preserved this documents for future genealogist. > > Sincerely, > Susana Leniski >
- Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios
Comentario
Susana: If you read my previous message you will note that there are in fact a great deal of records at the Inmaculada parrish in Jerez that are not filmed... Leonardo de la Torre Berumen has transcribed a great deal of these records but filming them would also be valuable. I don't know if it is going to be possible given the condition that they are in and according to Leonardo make them difficult to film and is perhaps the reason why they passed them up in the first place. There are also records in Colotlan that are not filmed. The priest there is obstinate about not allowing access so it would require permission from the bishop in Zacatecas. If you are interested in pushing this forward, I would be willing to help. --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Susana Leniski" <susyfarias@c...> wrote: > > To anyone researching in La Inmaculada/Jerez, Zacatecas > > I have some information that can be valuable for anyone researching in Jerez > > 1. THE CASE OF THE 20-25 PAGES OF MARRIAGES > > The first time I reviewed the film # 440059. Matrimonios 1712-1745. I noticed that the film started in the middle of the book. I searched for the missing pages until I found them. They are in the previous film. Film # 440058. Informacion Matrimonial 1961. Yes, you read right 1961. In this film after the 1961 information, all the way at the end of the film.( You even pass a section in "blank".) There is the first roll of film of marriages. There are about 20-25 pages of the oldest marriages in microfilm for Jerez (1712), part of the 1st book.I already spoke to the expert for Latin-American in the main Library in Utah (that was 2 years ago). I hope they will place a note in the Library Catalogue in the near future. > > 2. THE CASE OF THE MISSING MICROFILMS > > Recently I spoke over the phone to the person in charge of the archives in the Church La Inmaculada in Jerez, Zacatecas. He told me that the oldest Marriage that they have is 1697 and Marriage Information November 3, 1665. As we know in the LDS Library Catalogue the marriages start in 1712 (missing 15 years) and in Marriage Information 1789 (missing 124 years). He speculated that when they did the microfilming of the records (around 1960) they asked for the church "books", and all these information are "single sheets-hojas sueltas). During my conversation with him he was flipping the actual documents. At the same time, I felt my heart was flipping. I could see the long lost marriage, my brick wall in that bundle of papers. I already wrote 2 e-mails to the AGN (Archivo General de la Nacion), but I haven't received a response.I also called the main Library in Utah with this information. I spoke to the same expert, and she took some notes. I have my doubts that my petition for microfilming was forward. Does anyone know where I can petition formally the microfilming of these records? What can we do? > I also asked in the church in Jerez if the archives were open to the public. I was told that access can be granted thru the Dioceses of Zacatecas (or Archdioceses). I don't know if you can petition for this on-line. I'm hoping I will be able to go to Jerez next year and search in the archives of the church. But, I think we should preserved this documents for future genealogist. > > Sincerely, > Susana Leniski >
- Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios
Comentario
Susana: In addition to all of the missing films you mention, Leonardo de la Torre Berumen, the municipal archivist in Jerez tells me that most of the years for confirmations in the mid-1600s are also available and while these are not as comprehensive as the baptisms as children that die young, etc. were not confirmed, any children that survived and later got married and procreated would certainly be in there. There are also a whole series of "hojas sueltas" from the old Franciscan Convent in Colotlan that were never filmed. These are also from marriages, baptisms, burials in the mid-1600s. Also would be great to break through these brick walls. I am going to try to access the latter when I am down there next week. I will inquire about getting to see the former. Would be worthwhile to have them all filmed (and indexed). Someone in the group mentioned that they had Benito Samuel Sanchez Garcia help them arrange filming of previously unfilmed records. --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Susana Leniski" <susyfarias@c...> wrote: > > To anyone researching in La Inmaculada/Jerez, Zacatecas > > I have some information that can be valuable for anyone researching in Jerez > > 1. THE CASE OF THE 20-25 PAGES OF MARRIAGES > > The first time I reviewed the film # 440059. Matrimonios 1712-1745. I noticed that the film started in the middle of the book. I searched for the missing pages until I found them. They are in the previous film. Film # 440058. Informacion Matrimonial 1961. Yes, you read right 1961. In this film after the 1961 information, all the way at the end of the film.( You even pass a section in "blank".) There is the first roll of film of marriages. There are about 20-25 pages of the oldest marriages in microfilm for Jerez (1712), part of the 1st book.I already spoke to the expert for Latin-American in the main Library in Utah (that was 2 years ago). I hope they will place a note in the Library Catalogue in the near future. > > 2. THE CASE OF THE MISSING MICROFILMS > > Recently I spoke over the phone to the person in charge of the archives in the Church La Inmaculada in Jerez, Zacatecas. He told me that the oldest Marriage that they have is 1697 and Marriage Information November 3, 1665. As we know in the LDS Library Catalogue the marriages start in 1712 (missing 15 years) and in Marriage Information 1789 (missing 124 years). He speculated that when they did the microfilming of the records (around 1960) they asked for the church "books", and all these information are "single sheets-hojas sueltas). During my conversation with him he was flipping the actual documents. At the same time, I felt my heart was flipping. I could see the long lost marriage, my brick wall in that bundle of papers. I already wrote 2 e-mails to the AGN (Archivo General de la Nacion), but I haven't received a response.I also called the main Library in Utah with this information. I spoke to the same expert, and she took some notes. I have my doubts that my petition for microfilming was forward. Does anyone know where I can petition formally the microfilming of these records? What can we do? > I also asked in the church in Jerez if the archives were open to the public. I was told that access can be granted thru the Dioceses of Zacatecas (or Archdioceses). I don't know if you can petition for this on-line. I'm hoping I will be able to go to Jerez next year and search in the archives of the church. But, I think we should preserved this documents for future genealogist. > > Sincerely, > Susana Leniski >
- Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Reply