Joseph, I think your question on scholarly research is excellent! I would love to see a simple directory with that type of information. By the way, along these lines, I have an acquaintance (via Internet only) in Jaliso who is both a genealogist and is involved in scholarly research. He is a historian in Encarnacion de Diaz, Jalisco, and is very knowledgeable on area history in general. I haven't written to him in AGES (perhaps he's not very happy with me for not writing!) You may have already spoken with him, but just in case, I'll forward his contact information. His name is Rodolfo Humberto Hernandez and he can be found at: rodolfohdzch@... . I would venture to say Mr. Ryskamp would comment that notarial records are some of the most valuable yet underused resources. I went to a workshop he presented once and he was quite convincing about their merit. Unfortunately, I, myself, have never used them. But I've seen many and I know that they are a wealth of information - the in-depth type that will paint a picture, rather than just scratch the surface with dates. I hope to spend some time on these records before long. Have a great time in DC! Thanks for all you do! Connie Connie Dominguez El Paso, TX, USA >--- Original Message --- >From: Joseph Puentes <makas@...> >To: makas_nc <makas_nc@...>, makas@..., LosRanchos <ranchos@yahoogroups.com>, Ciudad_Juarez@yahoogroups.com >Date: 9/18/05 4:13:57 PM > >I'm going to DC on the 24 for the Hispanic Family History Symposium. I'm >going to record Mr. Ryskamp and at least one other Archivist for my >Podcast project (http://NuestrosRanchos.net). Its possible that I might >interview him that day. . .thanks to Mickey Garcia who asked him if he >would let me interview him (thanks Mickey). > >Can you all think of any other questions. . .so far here are my >questions with 3 of yours: > >Members of the Ranchos group were interested in these first three questions: > >Are there any school or other institution projects to motivate children to get interested in family >history and research? > >Are there are any kind of statistics or failure/success rates for >genealogy researchers in terms of a generation count? In other words, >what can the average genealogist realistically expect to find from >available sources? > >Are you taking on new clients and what are your rates? > > >My questions: > >When using FHC's for research the temptation is to stay with baptism, birth, marriage, death and matrimonial >Informacion records. What would you say are the most valuable but under used records available through the LDS library >and/or other archives? > >What other archives would be best to use in specific research for Jalisco, Zacatecas, Aguascalientes and Chihuahua? Are there >US Archives that have significant holdings on these states? > >In the Arch Diocese of Guadalajara there are many interesting records that would take a life time to go through. >Sangrada Mitra marriage dispensation records. . .Notary records. . .Land and water records. . .Priest Ordination records >and many other misc. records. How many of these groups of records would you be comfortable commenting on? Of them I >would especially like to hear some comments about Notary records? > >Do you have any bibliographical sources for some of the above record groups? > >Where would a person find "experts" on these record groups? There are many univerisities that are doing scholarly work >it would be great if there were a directory or a research aid to find the best person, group or university about specific >record groups. > >When is it time to use a professional researcher? > >How do you evaluate a professional researcher? > >When doing research in Mexico is it best to find a professional researcher from that locality? > >I've heard it said that one could hire a professional researcher to help you find general information >sources as opposed to specific genealogy research. What is your opinion of this? > >Do you know of professional researchers for the states of Jalisco, Zacatecas, Aguascalientes and Chihuahua? > >other questions I haven't thought of yet. > >thanks again. . .joseph > > > > > > > > > > > > >
