FW: [ranchos] Re: mtDNA and other DNA
class=292171403-21112005>Victor.....I don't know what is causing this but your
message got truncated again......this time it is even
shorter......Josie
From: ranchos@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:ranchos@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
v.h.villarreal
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 12:00
AM
To: ranchos@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ranchos] Re: mtDNA
and other DNA
--- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Josie T. Trevino"
<Josiett3@s...> wrote:
>
> Victor.......is this the complete
message? It appears that you left off in
> the middle of a
sentence......Thanks! Josie
>
> _____
>
Josie, it
looks like the message got truncated. Below is a copy of that same
message.
----------------------->
That's a keen observation and
a good question about the number of differences in our mtDNA in relation to the
CRS reference.
Let's start by saying that the CRS (Cambridge Reference
Sequence) is just an arbitrary reference selected by some team of geneticist
that were among the first to study the genetic sequences of mitochondrial
DNA. They decided to use the sequence of one of their subjects as a
comparison reference, maybe one of their own samples, who knows?. The
selected mtDNA belongs to haplogroup H, the most prevalent haplogroup in
Europe. Therefore many Eur



